Geodesic
How to Account for the Uncertainty in The QoS Selection Task
Serdica Journal of Computing, Tome 11 (2017) no. 2, pp. 165-182.

Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library

The paper presents an approach to QoS selection of web services. It introduces a theoretical frame and respective applicable selection procedures, in which the solution accounts for the uncertainty of the existing metrics data and client preference. Methods of two general cases are revealed in detail. The first method considers a selection based on one service quality. The second method assesses the integrated QoS of interesting properties. The theoretical analysis is validated through experimental investigation of real data of services’ quality metrics. ACM Computing Classification System (1998): H.3.7, K.3.1.
Mots-clés : Personalization, E-Learning, Multimedia Digital Libraries, Adaptive Access, Service-Based Architecture 
@article{SJC_2017_11_2_a4,
     author = {Georgieva, Olga},
     title = {How to {Account} for the {Uncertainty} in {The} {QoS} {Selection} {Task}},
     journal = {Serdica Journal of Computing},
     pages = {165--182},
     publisher = {mathdoc},
     volume = {11},
     number = {2},
     year = {2017},
     language = {en},
     url = {https://geodesic-test.mathdoc.fr/item/SJC_2017_11_2_a4/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Georgieva, Olga
TI  - How to Account for the Uncertainty in The QoS Selection Task
JO  - Serdica Journal of Computing
PY  - 2017
SP  - 165
EP  - 182
VL  - 11
IS  - 2
PB  - mathdoc
UR  - https://geodesic-test.mathdoc.fr/item/SJC_2017_11_2_a4/
LA  - en
ID  - SJC_2017_11_2_a4
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A Georgieva, Olga
%T How to Account for the Uncertainty in The QoS Selection Task
%J Serdica Journal of Computing
%D 2017
%P 165-182
%V 11
%N 2
%I mathdoc
%U https://geodesic-test.mathdoc.fr/item/SJC_2017_11_2_a4/
%G en
%F SJC_2017_11_2_a4
Georgieva, Olga. How to Account for the Uncertainty in The QoS Selection Task. Serdica Journal of Computing, Tome 11 (2017) no. 2, pp. 165-182. https://geodesic-test.mathdoc.fr/item/SJC_2017_11_2_a4/